public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
@ 2005-05-26 16:58 bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 17:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/21770] " pcarlini at suse dot de
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-26 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Ami pointed this out to me a while ago. It seems as if we need to be able to
support things like:
std::vector<int, std::allocator<char> >
which was news to me. The current implementation is ... not so good about this.
This is a QoI issue, where Dinkumware and RW do this.
So, implement, figure out a way to test this, and apply consistently for all
containers.
--
Summary: rebinding allocator::value type vs.
container::value_type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-26 17:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 17:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-26 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 17:43 -------
This is news to me too: what about 23.1/8? It says:
"All other constructors for these container types take an Allocator& argument
(20.1.5), an allocator whose value type is the same as the container's value
type"
Allocator is the template argument of the vector class, of course. Missing a
clarification of the above, or a DR?!?, I consider this as an extension, lower
priority than other new issues.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 17:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/21770] " pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 17:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 18:23 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-26 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pcarlini at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 17:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/21770] " pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 17:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 18:23 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 20:13 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-26 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 18:17 -------
... that said, if we agree about the substance of the issue, I volunteer to
work on it: have already some experience with rebind-related issues in
basic_string. Ah, yes, this extension makes certainly sense, because, for
basic_string doesn't exist an equivalent of 23.1/8, rebinding is necessary
in any case. Matter of consistency, in other terms: already noticed in
comment #23 of 19495, by the way ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 18:23 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 20:13 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2005-05-26 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at redhat dot com @ 2005-05-26 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2005-05-26 20:12 -------
Subject: Re: rebinding allocator::value type vs.
container::value_type
Yo P, just trying to get through the deluge. I've not looked into
specifics, so sorry for such a vague marker in bugzilla.
I'm not quite sure of where the standard stands on this. I think it's QoI, not required. However, it seems like a good idea.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 20:13 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
@ 2005-05-26 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 20:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-26 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26 20:15 -------
Hmm, maybe there should be a way in debug mode to diagnose this at runtime since this seems like a
violation of the standard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-26 20:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 21:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-26 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 20:19 -------
Agreed. Then, I'm going to look into it. Testcases are easy to find: actually,
your example, std::vector<int, std::allocator<char> > , doesn't even compile,
currently.
To Andrew: maybe, in pedantic mode. But notice that the problem should be
detected at *compile* time: indeed seems doable using a bit of template
tricks: is_same<allocator::value_type, container::value_type> ...
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-26 20:19:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 20:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 21:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-03 17:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-26 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 20:50 -------
Actually, we already have the machinery, in concept-checks ;) Would be:
__glibcxx_class_requires2(_Tp, typename _Alloc::value_type, _SameTypeConcept)
on top of each container.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 21:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-03 17:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-03 17:12 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-03 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03 17:07 -------
Subject: Bug 21770
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: paolo@gcc.gnu.org 2005-06-03 17:07:48
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/include/bits: basic_string.h deque.tcc list.tcc
stl_deque.h stl_list.h stl_map.h
stl_multimap.h stl_multiset.h
stl_set.h stl_vector.h vector.tcc
Added files:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string: 1.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation:
1.cc
3.cc
Removed files:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/list:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/map:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multimap:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multiset:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/set:
explicit_instantiation.cc
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector:
explicit_instantiation.cc
Log message:
2005-06-03 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
PR libstdc++/21770
* include/bits/stl_deque.h: Add concept-check. In class _Deque_base
rebind _Alloc to _Tp_alloc_type, change _Deque_impl to inherit from
the latter and add _M_get_Tp_allocator() which returns it. Use
everywhere _M_get_Tp_allocator() instead of get_allocator().
* include/bits/deque.tcc: Likewise, use _M_get_Tp_allocator().
* include/bits/stl_list.h: Add concept-check. In class _List_base
rebind _Alloc to _Tp_alloc_type and add _M_get_Tp_allocator(), which
returns the allocator (of type _Node_alloc_type) converted to
_Tp_alloc_type. Use everywhere _M_get_Tp_allocator() instead of
get_allocator().
* include/bits/list.tcc: Likewise, use _M_get_Tp_allocator().
* include/bits/stl_vector.h: Add concept-check. In class _Vector_base
rebind _Alloc to _Tp_alloc_type, change _Vector_impl to inherit from
the latter and add _M_get_Tp_allocator() which returns it. Use
everywhere _M_get_Tp_allocator() instead of get_allocator().
* include/bits/vector.tcc: Likewise, use _M_get_Tp_allocator().
* include/bits/stl_map.h: Add concept-check. Rebind _Alloc to
_Pair_alloc_type and use it for _Rb_tree.
* include/bits/stl_multimap.h: Likewise.
* include/bits/stl_multiset.h: Add concept-check. Rebind _Alloc to
_Key_alloc_type and use it for _Rb_tree.
* include/bits/stl_set.h: Likewise.
* include/bits/basic_string.h: Rebind _Alloc to _CharT_alloc_type and
use it for the allocator typedefs.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/1.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: ... here.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: ... here.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: ... here.
* testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: .. here.
* testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: .. here.
* testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: .. here.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation.cc: Move to...
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation/1.cc: ... here.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation/3.cc: New.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3027&r2=1.3028
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.79&r2=1.80
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/list.tcc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_deque.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.57&r2=1.58
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_map.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_multimap.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_multiset.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_set.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.54&r2=1.55
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/list/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/map/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multimap/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/multiset/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/explicit_instantiation/3.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-03 17:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-03 17:12 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 0:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-06-03 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-03 17:12 -------
Done.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-03 17:12 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-07 0:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-07 0:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-07 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 00:06 -------
Paolo Note that the new testcases (explicit_instantiation/3.cc) fail in debug mode.
To test this, use -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG in scripts/testsuite_flags
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-07 0:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-07 0:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 0:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-06-07 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-07 00:10 -------
Well, of course they do. They also fail with concept-checks enabled. Do we really
want to allow for this extension in debug-mode too? If we agree about that, I
can work on it, lower priority, really, however ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-07 0:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-07 0:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 2:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-07 2:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-06-07 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-07 00:51 -------
Actually, we can fix that elegantly, removing some inconsistencies in the typedefs
of the debug-mode code ;) I'm on it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-07 0:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-07 2:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-07 2:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-07 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 02:23 -------
Subject: Bug 21770
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: paolo@gcc.gnu.org 2005-06-07 02:23:44
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/include/debug: deque list map.h multimap.h
multiset.h set.h vector
Log message:
2005-06-06 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
PR libstdc++/21770 (cont: debug-mode)
* include/debug/deque: Use _Base typedefs for pointer, const_pointer,
reference, const_reference.
* include/debug/list: Likewise.
* include/debug/map.h: Likewise.
* include/debug/multimap.h: Likewise.
* include/debug/multiset.h: Likewise.
* include/debug/set.h: Likewise.
* include/debug/vector: Likewise.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3032&r2=1.3033
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/deque.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/list.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/map.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/multimap.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/multiset.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/set.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-07 2:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-07 2:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-07 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 02:55 -------
Subject: Bug 21770
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: paolo@gcc.gnu.org 2005-06-07 02:55:06
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/include/debug: string
Added files:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string: 2.cc
Log message:
2005-06-06 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
PR libstdc++/21770 (cont: __gnu_debug::string)
* include/debug/string: Use _Base typedefs for pointer, const_pointer,
reference, const_reference, size_type, difference_type.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/2.cc: New.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3033&r2=1.3034
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/string.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/2.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-07 2:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-26 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/21770] New: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 17:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/21770] " pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 17:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 18:23 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 20:13 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2005-05-26 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-26 20:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 21:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-03 17:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-03 17:12 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 0:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-07 0:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 0:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-06-07 2:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-07 2:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).