* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-03-06 20:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-06 20:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-06 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 20:33 -------
This one was fixed a long time since but does not seem to have been cleared.
The recent flurry of activity on the dependency checking has made keeping it
open unnecessary IMHO.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-03-06 20:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-06 20:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-06 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 20:44 -------
Are you sure? forall_8.f90 testcase still fails for me with gfortran
as of a few days ago.
If the problem is fixed and the testcases aren't invalid, they should be
added to the testsuite, otherwise this needs to be reopened.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-03-06 20:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-06 20:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-09 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-25 15:12 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-09 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 00:34 -------
Reopening since the testcase has been xfailed IIRC.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Keywords| |xfail
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-09 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-25 15:12 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-25 18:10 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-25 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 -------
Subject: Bug 22038
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006
New Revision: 114987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114987
Log:
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/25056
* interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal
argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure.
PR fortran/27554
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure
passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is
an intrinsic.
PR fortran/25073
* resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to
keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions.
Signal an error is either value appears more than once.
PR fortran/20874
* resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental
function is not scalar valued.
PR fortran/20867
* match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables.
PR fortran/22038
* match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as
FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails.
PR fortran/28119
* match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to
gfc_match_eos.
PR fortran/25072
* resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework
forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of
2, when the code->expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved.
This is used to change "block" to "mask" in the non-PURE
error message.
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/20867
* gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25056
* gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/20874
* gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25073
* gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test.
PR fortran/27554
* intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test.
PR fortran/22038
PR fortran/28119
* gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25072
* gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-25 15:12 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-25 18:10 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-25 18:13 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-29 21:42 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-25 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 -------
Subject: Bug 22038
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006
New Revision: 114994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114994
Log:
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/25056
* interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal
argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure.
PR fortran/27554
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure
passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is
an intrinsic.
PR fortran/25073
* resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to
keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions.
Signal an error is either value appears more than once.
PR fortran/20874
* resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental
function is not scalar valued.
PR fortran/20867
* match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables.
PR fortran/22038
* match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as
FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails.
PR fortran/28119
* match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to
gfc_match_eos.
PR fortran/25072
* resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework
forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of
2, when the code->expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved.
This is used to change "block" to "mask" in the non-PURE
error message.
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/20867
* gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25056
* gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/20874
* gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25073
* gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test.
PR fortran/27554
* intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test.
PR fortran/22038
PR fortran/28119
* gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25072
* gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-25 18:10 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-25 18:13 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-29 21:42 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-25 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:12 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
[not found] <bug-22038-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-25 18:13 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-29 21:42 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-06-29 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-29 21:41 -------
Subject: Bug number PR22038
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01238.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread