From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-146597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8399 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2005 17:48:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8389 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jun 2005 17:48:20 -0000
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050612174820.8387.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041225214626.19155.Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
References: <20041225214626.19155.Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01677.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-12 17:48 -------
Sigh.  I really, really, detest these special cases of "E+00" and "+  ",
which violate the Fortran 95 standard.  But, g77 appears to accept
both. :-(

OK for mainline. :-(

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155