From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21034 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2005 03:28:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21019 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2005 03:28:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050613032800.21018.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041210130028.18923.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20041210130028.18923.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/18923] segfault after subroutine name confusion X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01701.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:27 ------- Hmm, on powerpc-darwin built at -O0, we don't get a seg fault but on i686-pc-linux-gnu with a bootstrapped compiler we do. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18923