public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0/4.1 Regression] suboptimal use of fancy x86 addressing modes Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050613124609.29647.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20041113170938.18463.steven@gcc.gnu.org> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 12:46 ------- On the mainline we get now: .L4: movl (%ebp,%edx,4), %eax movl %eax, (%ebx,%edx,4) movl (%esi,%edx,4), %eax movl %eax, (%ecx,%edx,4) incl %edx cmpl %edx, %edi jne .L4 Which is better but the two loads/stores are not scheduled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18463
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-13 12:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-11-13 17:09 [Bug middle-end/18463] New: [4.0 Regression] Moving floating point through an integer register steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 17:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18463] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 17:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 17:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 18:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/18463] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 19:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 23:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 23:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18463] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 23:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 8:12 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:56 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:39 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-05 4:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 2:34 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 2:37 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0 Regression] suboptimal use of fancy x86 addressing modes steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 3:16 ` tbptbp at gmail dot com 2005-04-21 5:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0/4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-21 7:58 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 12:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-06-13 13:40 ` jh at suse dot cz 2005-07-08 1:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 18:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 8:21 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 11:04 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 12:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 12:41 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2005-09-19 15:20 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20 7:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 16:22 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050613124609.29647.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).