From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13218 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2005 16:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13207 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jun 2005 16:42:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050615164250.13205.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "vincent at vinc17 dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050417072328.21067.bagnara@cs.unipr.it> References: <20050417072328.21067.bagnara@cs.unipr.it> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/21067] Excessive optimization of floating point expression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02031.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From vincent at vinc17 dot org 2005-06-15 16:42 ------- Even without , the function could be in a library called in a directed rounding mode. And one can change the rounding mode via a standard function in the glibc, no need for a pragma. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21067