public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message
@ 2005-06-17 6:07 d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 6:08 ` [Bug fortran/22101] " d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk @ 2005-06-17 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Compilation of the attached F90 module which uses liked lists, causes the following error message to
appear repeatedly. removing the use of => null() to initialise the pointers causes comilation to suceed.
The code compiles sucesfully under compac visual fortran on a PC and Pro Fortran on an SGI system.
The output from "gfortran -v -save-temps -c CutCellRoutines.f90" is
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --enable-languages=c,f95
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050325 (experimental)
/usr/local/gfortran/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0/4.1.0/f951 CutCellRoutines.f90 -fPIC
-quiet -dumpbase CutCellRoutines.f90 -auxbase CutCellRoutines -version -o CutCellRoutines.s
GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050325 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0)
compiled by GNU C version 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1640).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
In file CutCellRoutines.f90:35
type solid_body_node
1
Error: Pointer assignment target is neither TARGET nor POINTER at (1)
In file CutCellRoutines.f90:35
type solid_body_node
1
Error: Pointer assignment target is neither TARGET nor POINTER at (1)
In file CutCellRoutines.f90:35
(*** error repeated 8 times ***)
--
Summary: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes
compilation to fail with a spurious error message
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
GCC target triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/22101] use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message
2005-06-17 6:07 [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
@ 2005-06-17 6:08 ` d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 14:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk @ 2005-06-17 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk 2005-06-17 06:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=9103)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9103&action=view)
Fortran source which causes the error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/22101] use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message
2005-06-17 6:07 [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 6:08 ` [Bug fortran/22101] " d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
@ 2005-06-17 14:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-18 18:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-19 8:18 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-17 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17 14:47 -------
This is most likely the same bug as PR 16606 or PR 21370 but since I have not reduced it yet, I don't
know which one for sure.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |16606, 21370
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/22101] use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message
2005-06-17 6:07 [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 6:08 ` [Bug fortran/22101] " d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 14:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-18 18:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-19 8:18 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-18 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-18 18:31 -------
Reduction of this one:
type solid
integer :: i = 0
end type solid
type(solid), pointer :: a
end
so, this is indeed PR 16606. Thanks for reporting!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16606 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/22101] use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message
2005-06-17 6:07 [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-18 18:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-19 8:18 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-19 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 22101 depends on bug 16606, which changed state.
Bug 16606 Summary: gfortran error with a valid derived type definition
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16606
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-19 8:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-17 6:07 [Bug fortran/22101] New: use of type(x), pointer:: next => null() causes compilation to fail with a spurious error message d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 6:08 ` [Bug fortran/22101] " d dot m dot Ingram at MMU dot ac dot uk
2005-06-17 14:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-18 18:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-19 8:18 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).