From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2378 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 17:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2363 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2005 17:22:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050617172208.2362.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "roger at eyesopen dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050615205609.22083.lmakhlis@bmc.com> References: <20050615205609.22083.lmakhlis@bmc.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02294.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-06-17 17:22 ------- Unfortunately, the AIX 5.1 machine that was loaned to OpenEye by IBM has had to be returned since this patch was submitted/applied in 2003. So my only guess is that this may have been a patch level issue with bos.adt.libm as I'm fairly confident that our 5.1 machine had sqrtf and friends when the patch was developed. We do still have a 5.2 machine, and that certainly has sqrtf. Could this be related to the version(s) of IBM's Visual Age C/C++, that was installed on the machine? Unfortunately, without access to a 5.1 box I'm unable to properly test the obvious trivial change to config/rs6000/aix51.h. Clearly, if there are flavors of AIX 5.1 out there without sqrtf, it unsafe to define TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS in aix51.h. Fortunately, such a change won't negatively affect users of AIX 5.2 or later. Dave, I'm happy to post an untested patch to gcc-patches if that's appropriate. Alternatively, Lev could you try removing the five lines I added to aix51.h and confirm that that resolves the issues you're seeing. Many thanks in advance. Sorry for any inconvenience. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22083