From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-147222-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14883 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 19:32:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14731 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2005 19:32:27 -0000
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050617193227.14730.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "lmakhlis at bmc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050615205609.22083.lmakhlis@bmc.com>
References: <20050615205609.22083.lmakhlis@bmc.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02302.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From lmakhlis at bmc dot com  2005-06-17 19:32 -------
Andrew: I am trying to run older (5.1) programs on a newer (5.2) system, not
vice versa -- why would that require forward (rather than backward) compatibility?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22083