public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
@ 2005-05-22 12:13 ams at gnu dot org
  2005-05-22 13:52 ` [Bug c/21706] " schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ams at gnu dot org @ 2005-05-22 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Please do not use MAXPATHLEN, it is a arbitrary limit, and is not
defined on GNU.  Currently gcc 4.0.0 is unbuildable on GNU since
[gcc]/gcc/tlink.c assumes that MAXPATHLEN is defined.  Please do not
use these kind of limits in GNU programs.

Suggested fix is to declare initial_cwd as:

  char *initial_cwd;

and then instead of doing:

  getcwd (initial_cwd, sizeof (initial_cwd));

do:

  initial_cwd = getcwd (NULL, 0);

Note: getcwd (NULL, 0) is a GNU extention, and might not be available
on non-GNU platforms.  (End of Note)

Sorry for not supplying a patch, happy hacking.

-- 
           Summary: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P1
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ams at gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-gnu0.3
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-gnu0.3
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-gnu0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-22 13:52 ` schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
  2005-05-22 14:04 ` [Bug middle-end/21706] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de @ 2005-05-22 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu dot org at nic-nac-
                   |                            |project dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
  2005-05-22 13:52 ` [Bug c/21706] " schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
@ 2005-05-22 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-22 15:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-22 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-22 14:04 -------
What about using PATH_MAX which is part of the POSIX standard?



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|critical                    |normal
          Component|c                           |middle-end
           Keywords|                            |build
           Priority|P1                          |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
  2005-05-22 13:52 ` [Bug c/21706] " schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
  2005-05-22 14:04 ` [Bug middle-end/21706] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-22 15:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
  2005-05-22 15:36 ` schwab at suse dot de
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-05-22 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2005-05-22 15:35 -------
Subject: Re:  MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c

"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| What about using PATH_MAX which is part of the POSIX standard?

I think the point was about arbitray limit; and as far as I can tell
GNU does not claim to be POSIX, does it? ;-)

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-22 15:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2005-05-22 15:36 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2005-05-26 13:51 ` ams at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-05-22 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2005-05-22 15:36 -------
Like most POSIX limits PATH_MAX may not be defined if the actual limit is not  
fixed.  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-22 15:36 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 13:51 ` ams at gnu dot org
  2005-05-30 15:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-19 14:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ams at gnu dot org @ 2005-05-26 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From ams at gnu dot org  2005-05-26 12:59 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Like most POSIX limits PATH_MAX may not be defined if the actual limit is not  
> fixed.  

Correct, and GNU doesn't have such a limit for the length of filenames, the
number of arguments passed to a program or the length of a hostname.  And
probobly a whole bunch of other things that have slipped my mind right now.
All of this is perfectly compliant with POSIX.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-26 13:51 ` ams at gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-30 15:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-19 14:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-30 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |21824
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
  2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-30 15:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-19 14:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-19 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-19 14:00 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-06-19 14:00:56
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-19 14:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-22 12:13 [Bug c/21706] New: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c ams at gnu dot org
2005-05-22 13:52 ` [Bug c/21706] " schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
2005-05-22 14:04 ` [Bug middle-end/21706] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-22 15:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 15:36 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-05-26 13:51 ` ams at gnu dot org
2005-05-30 15:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-19 14:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).