From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-147538-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14531 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 06:39:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14509 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jun 2005 06:39:39 -0000
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050620063939.14508.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050618100601.22111.themis_hv@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <20050618100601.22111.themis_hv@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ abi_check
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02618.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-20 06:39 -------
Ugh. Well, that's that way it used to work.... apparently now it's different.

Here, this gets to the same place, and removes some misleading bits in the
current  configury.

-benjamin

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22111