From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26581 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2005 18:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26563 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2005 18:00:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050621180036.26562.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22139] [4.1 regression] Segfault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02753.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-21 18:00 ------- This looks like a memory problem -- the backtrace is this: (gdb) r -quiet step-18.ii -o /dev/null Starting program: /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4.1-pre/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/cc1plus -quiet step-18.ii -o /dev/null step-18.ii:7102: warning: ‘__malloc__’ attribute ignored Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x084da5ef in ggc_set_mark (p=0x14) at ggc-page.c:594 594 return base[L1][L2]; (gdb) bt #0 0x084da5ef in ggc_set_mark (p=0x14) at ggc-page.c:594 #1 0x0814cb1f in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x43683dec) at gt-cp-tree.h:69 #2 0x0814cb88 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x4305fd80) at gt-cp-tree.h:349 #3 0x0814cf0d in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x4362c000) at gt-cp-tree.h:121 #4 0x0814ce36 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x42f96930) at gt-cp-tree.h:188 #5 0x0814ca86 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_decl (x_p=0x40982a40) at gt-cp-tree.h:367 #6 0x0814cfff in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x4362af30) at gt-cp-tree.h:151 #7 0x0814cb88 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x42f8ea50) at gt-cp-tree.h:349 #8 0x0814d757 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_type (x_p=0x4361a1b0) at gt-cp-tree.h:441 #9 0x0814d310 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x4362557c) at gt-cp-tree.h:182 #10 0x0814d214 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x436255e8) at gt-cp-tree.h:155 #11 0x0814cb88 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x42ff3618) at gt-cp-tree.h:349 #12 0x0814d232 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x4364e288) at gt-cp-tree.h:157 #13 0x0814ceef in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x436253cc) at gt-cp-tree.h:119 #14 0x0814cf58 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x436254a4) at gt-cp-tree.h:126 #15 0x0814ce36 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x42f9d738) at gt-cp-tree.h:188 and so on, for exactly 2500 frames. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22139