From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26819 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2005 18:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26804 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2005 18:43:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050621184317.26803.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22139] [4.0/4.1 regression] Segfault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02762.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21 18:43 ------- I am starting to think this is just a stack overflow and a defect in how the GC works (or someone forgot chain_next which should have reduced the stack usage). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22139