From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-147729-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 539 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2005 14:37:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32650 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jun 2005 14:37:22 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:37:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050622143722.32646.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050411131719.20945.denis.nagorny@intel.com>
References: <20050411131719.20945.denis.nagorny@intel.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] about 2x perfomance regression in comparision with 3.4.2
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02809.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-22 14:37 -------
I think this is the normal register pressure issue in GCC's RA.

See <http://www.gccsummit.org/2005/view_abstract.php?content_key=1> for a discussion which will 
happen later today.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|fortran                     |rtl-optimization
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization, ra


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945