From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22245 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2005 20:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21628 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2005 20:51:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050622205105.21627.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050615020311.22071.zlynx@acm.org> References: <20050615020311.22071.zlynx@acm.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22071] [4.1 regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2506 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02849.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-22 20:50 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2506 On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 20:13 +0000, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-22 20:13 ------- > > Can somebody do a binary search and find out what patch or patches broke this? > > I know what broke it. It was the structalias commit i did when it was added to the mainline. I'll fix it in the next few days. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22071