From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7388 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2005 18:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7348 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2005 18:13:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050623181334.7345.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050623042717.22154.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050623042717.22154.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22154] [DR 382] qualified names should allow typename keyword in front of it (even in non-templates) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg02949.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-23 18:13 ------- Subject: Re: [DR 382] qualified names should allow typename keyword in front of it (even in non-templates) "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-23 15:04 ------- | (In reply to comment #4) | > If that is what the DR says, then the DR does not make any sense... | Hey I am just reading what it says: | . | | DR 468 is about allowing ::template outside of templates. | | I am not making this up. I'm not saying you're making it up. It just strikes me that the new "subtlities" don't make much sense. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22154