From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9536 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2005 13:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9516 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jun 2005 13:29:55 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050625132955.9515.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040420093437.15023.bonzini@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040420093437.15023.bonzini@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/15023] -frename-registers is buggy and slow X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg03091.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-25 13:29 ------- This bug report is totally useless. There are no links to the relevant discussions that have apparently taken place. There are no test cases, no examples of what or where or why things go wrong. I believe this register renaming would be a useful pass for many targets, including amd64, so it would be nice to have this bug figured out and fixed. So if anyone knows where to find those discussions mentioned in comments #0 and #1, can he/she please link them to this report? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023