* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-28 12:17 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2005-06-28 12:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at redhat dot com @ 2005-06-28 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:16 -------
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:52:20AM -0000, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> Broken by patch from PR21959.
>
Are you sure? Kenner seemed to get good results from that patch.
If this was introduced by that patch, then it must've triggered a
latent bug elsewhere. The patch merely prevented transformation
opportunities in VRP.
> #14 0x4000000000b4f840 in ggc_collect () at ggc-page.c:1972
> #15 0x4000000000b58b60 in rest_of_compilation () at passes.c:423
> #16 0x40000000005d04f0 in execute_one_pass (pass=0x600000000000e840)
> at tree-optimize.c:665
>
Show me '*pass'?
Diego.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-28 12:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22216] " dnovillo at redhat dot com
@ 2005-06-28 12:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-28 12:52 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-06-28 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-28 12:42 -------
> Are you sure?
Yes.
> Show me '*pass'?
$1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
execute = @0x4000000001013990: 0x4000000000b569d0 <rest_of_compilation>,
sub = 0x0, next = 0x0, static_pass_number = -1, tv_id = 116,
properties_required = 267, properties_provided = 11,
properties_destroyed = 256, todo_flags_start = 0, todo_flags_finish = 2,
letter = 0 '\0'}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-28 12:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22216] " dnovillo at redhat dot com
2005-06-28 12:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-28 12:52 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2005-06-28 13:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at redhat dot com @ 2005-06-28 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:52 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -0000, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> $1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
> execute = @0x4000000001013990: 0x4000000000b569d0 <rest_of_compilation>,
> sub = 0x0, next = 0x0, static_pass_number = -1, tv_id = 116,
> properties_required = 267, properties_provided = 11,
> properties_destroyed = 256, todo_flags_start = 0, todo_flags_finish = 2,
> letter = 0 '\0'}
>
Huh, well that tells me nothing. If my ia64 supports Ada, I'll
try to take a look, otherwise you'll have to debug this yourself.
Diego.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-28 12:52 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
@ 2005-06-28 13:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-28 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 13:29 -------
Looking at the backtrace, it looks more like one of Honza's patches rather than the patch for PR21959.
On more likely the following patch (as I got a clean bootstrap on powerpc-darwin with no problems
before this, I have not tried after though):
-2005-06-28 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
-
- * cgraph.c (cgraph_remove_node): Do not release function bodies until
- full cgraph is built.
....
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jh at suse dot cz
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-28 13:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-28 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |
|org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2005-07-09 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at redhat dot com @ 2005-06-28 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 14:18 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -0000, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> > Are you sure?
>
> Yes.
>
You need to check your script then. The patch for 21959 had
nothing to do with this failure. I get the same ICE without that
patch.
Diego.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-28 14:18 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
@ 2005-07-09 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-09 17:19 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-09 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-09 16:40 -------
Does this work now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-09 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-09 17:19 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-07-09 17:58 ` jh at suse dot cz
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-07-09 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-09 17:15 -------
I can't reproduce it any more. Whether it's gone dormant again or fixed for
real I don't know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-09 17:19 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-07-09 17:58 ` jh at suse dot cz
2005-07-10 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2005-07-09 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-07-09 17:50 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
>
> ------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-09 17:15 -------
> I can't reproduce it any more. Whether it's gone dormant again or fixed for
> real I don't know.
I've bootstrapped with gcac from tree about a week old and it went
fluently, so hopefully it is fixed somehow.
Honza
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-09 17:58 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2005-07-10 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-17 19:56 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-10 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 18:34 -------
So closing as fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-10 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-17 19:56 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-07-26 23:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-07-17 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-17 19:49 -------
Definitely not fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-17 19:56 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-07-26 23:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 23:52 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-26 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 23:29 -------
Why "definitely not fixed"? You weren't so sure in comment #7. Did the
failure re-surface for you now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-26 23:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-26 23:52 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-07-26 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-26 23:48 -------
Yes, it did, for more than a week now, after being hidden for 2 weeks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-26 23:52 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-28 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-28 1:57 ` [Bug middle-end/22216] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-28 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |GC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-28 1:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-28 1:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-28 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22216] [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
2005-06-28 11:52 [Bug tree-optimization/22216] New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC schwab at suse dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-28 1:57 ` [Bug middle-end/22216] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-31 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-31 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 16:00 -------
>From the backtrace, this looks like PR 23651. I wonder what root is this from.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23651
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread