public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/22249] New: GCC does not reject an incompatible type declaration
@ 2005-06-30 13:20 neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 13:33 ` [Bug c/22249] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-30 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I don't believe the standard requires the following to be rejected, but as a QOI
issue I believe it should be. The debatable point is whether you believe the
composite of the first two is specified by a function definition; if you do then
you must reject. GCC rejects it if the order of the first two is switched.
void r(x) int (*x)[2]; {}
void r();
void r(int (*x)[3]); /* Ideally rejected. */
Flags are e.g. -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic
--
Summary: GCC does not reject an incompatible type declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-30 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-30 13:20 [Bug c/22249] New: GCC does not reject an incompatible type declaration neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 13:33 ` [Bug c/22249] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).