From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26053 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2005 15:10:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25975 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2005 15:10:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050630151044.25973.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050630145509.22252.matz@suse.de> References: <20050630145509.22252.matz@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22252] [4.0/4.1 Regression] pragma interface/implementation still break synthesized methods X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg03583.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 15:10 ------- (In reply to comment #1) Yes which is why I did not confirm it yet because I did not look at fully. I just added the diagnostic keyword because it is still a wrong warning. I am adding wrong-code also. Reduced testcase: ---- a.ii ---- # 1 "a.cc" # 0 "" # 1 "" # 1 "a.cc" #pragma implementation # 1 "a.h" 1 struct B { B(){}; ~B(){} }; #pragma interface struct A { B a; }; # 3 "a.cc" 2 ---- use.ii ---- # 1 "use.cc" # 0 "" # 1 "" # 1 "use.cc" # 1 "a.h" 1 struct B { B(){}; ~B(){} }; #pragma interface struct A { B a; }; # 2 "use.cc" 2 A a; int main() {} -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-30 15:10:43 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22252