From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9548 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2005 23:49:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8852 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2005 23:49:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050630234909.8851.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050630231800.22263.sebor@roguewave.com> References: <20050630231800.22263.sebor@roguewave.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22263] explicit instantiation fails to emit symbols defined later X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg03655.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 23:49 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry about the duplicate PR. I searched Bugzilla for an existing report but > obviously not thoroughly enough. > > I'm afraid I disagree with the analysis in both PRs. From 14.7.2, p7: That P only applies to specializations if I read it correctly and there is no specialization in your testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263