From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9014 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2005 08:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8995 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2005 08:08:44 -0000 Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 08:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050702080844.8993.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050630200958.22259.fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050630200958.22259.fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/22259] [4.1 Regression] spawnv cannot execute gcc/as X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02 08:08 ------- > One option: have gcc/Makefile stamp-as target test "build" and output > appropriate script to MS Windows BATCH file as.bat. I tried to copy the assembler in the tree, instead of making a script pointing to it. It works. Is there any drawback to this approach? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22259