public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gcc2eran at tromer dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/22278] gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 04:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050703041424.27151.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050702164323.22278.olivier.baudron@m4x.org>


------- Additional Comments From gcc2eran at tromer dot org  2005-07-03 04:14 -------
(In reply to comment #30)
> | OK. Then the volatile-stripping direction can be handled arbitrarily.
> 
> I do not understand that comment.

I meant that we were mostly concerned about what the standard says about the
effect of casting (say) int* into volatile int*, but the other directly is
simply undefined. 

Still, consider the following variant:

  void quux(int *bar) {
    *(volatile int*)bar = 42;
  }

  volatile int foo;
  quux((int*)&foo);

This time there is no "attempt [...] to refer to an object defined with a
volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified
type". So why does gcc 4.0.0 -O3 still optimize away the assignment? And how
would you fix that with an approach that construes the standard to require
following the type of the "real" object?

Could the standard intend something so convoluted, when the interpretation in
comment 23 makes things perfectly sensible, well-defined and (in principle) easy
to implement?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-03  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-02 16:43 [Bug c/22278] New: " olivier dot baudron at m4x dot org
2005-07-02 16:48 ` [Bug c/22278] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-02 22:08   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-02 16:59 ` olivier dot baudron at m4x dot org
2005-07-02 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-02 17:33 ` falk at debian dot org
2005-07-02 17:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-02 17:53 ` falk at debian dot org
2005-07-02 20:38 ` falk at debian dot org
2005-07-02 22:07 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-02 22:08 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:10 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:10 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:12 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:19 ` falk at debian dot org
2005-07-02 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-02 22:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:39 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-02 22:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-02 23:30 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  0:03   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-02 23:45 ` falk at debian dot org
2005-07-02 23:54 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  0:03 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  1:19 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  1:27 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-07-03  1:42 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  1:43 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  1:47 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  1:54 ` hugh at mimosa dot com
2005-07-03  2:30 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  2:54 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  4:14 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org [this message]
2005-07-03  4:43   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-03  4:43 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  5:11   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-03  5:09 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  5:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  5:18 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  5:40 ` hugh at mimosa dot com
2005-07-03  6:59 ` gcc2eran at tromer dot org
2005-07-03  7:09 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-07-03  7:27 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-03  7:54 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-07-05  2:17 ` james at juranfamily dot org
2005-07-15  6:41 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15  7:52   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-15  8:10 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-16 16:35 ` hugh at mimosa dot com
2005-07-16 17:53 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-17  8:09 ` hugh at mimosa dot com
2005-07-17 16:59 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 20:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22278] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20  0:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20  0:26 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-11 23:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050703041424.27151.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).