From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19133 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2005 12:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19084 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2005 12:17:52 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050703121752.19082.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050703113441.22284.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050703113441.22284.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-03 12:17 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, jakub at redhat dot com wrote: > Strange, I have certainly bootstrapped/regtested the initial -fstack-protector > patch on ia64-linux and there were no regressions, neither on HEAD > (20050625 tree + those patches) nor in the 4.0.1 backport. > g++.dg/eh/cond1.C compiles/runs just fine for me. Example ia64-linux results showing the failure are at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00117.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01730.html I don't have access to ia64-linux to run a regression search there, but I can run one on ia64-hpux if necessary to see if it is the same patch causing the failures there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284