From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10760 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2005 13:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10706 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jul 2005 13:41:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050706134130.10705.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050706093241.22321.paul.woegerer@nsc.com> References: <20050706093241.22321.paul.woegerer@nsc.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22321] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06 13:41 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I used snapshot 4_1_20050508. After updating the crx-port > to the latest snapshot (4_1_20050702) the bug disappeared. But it is still a latent bug as I showed in comment #5, it is just harder to reproduce. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22321