public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17692] [4.0/4.1? Regression] gcc -O hangs on glnxa64
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050707002030.21813.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040927140942.17692.fsmith@mathworks.com>
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-07 00:20 -------
Thus, we have a regression in 4.0. The regression does not show in 4.1, but
it's unclear whether it was fixed or it is just hidden by the different code
produced with the new tree passes.
The compile-time-hog with 3.3 does not matter at this point, as 3.3 is
unsupported.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords|compile-time-hog |ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail| |4.0.1
Known to work| |3.4.4
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-07 00:20:28
date| |
Summary|gcc -O hangs on glnxa64 |[4.0/4.1? Regression] gcc -O
| |hangs on glnxa64
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17692
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-27 14:09 [Bug c/17692] New: " fsmith at mathworks dot com
2004-09-27 14:12 ` [Bug c/17692] " fsmith at mathworks dot com
2004-09-27 14:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-27 14:35 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-09-29 12:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-01 16:53 ` fsmith at mathworks dot com
2004-10-01 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-01 17:20 ` fsmith at mathworks dot com
2005-07-06 21:00 ` gnu at the-meissners dot org
2005-07-06 21:46 ` gnu at the-meissners dot org
2005-07-07 0:20 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it [this message]
2005-07-08 1:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17692] [4.0/4.1? Regression] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-28 17:17 ` [Bug target/17692] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-28 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-28 20:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-28 20:56 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-28 21:03 ` [Bug target/17692] [4.0/4.1? Regression] ICE splitting sse conditional move rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050707002030.21813.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).