From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22498 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2005 22:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22374 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2005 22:14:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050707221423.22373.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050707202900.22355.yuri@tsoft.com> References: <20050707202900.22355.yuri@tsoft.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22355] Multiple local static variables initialization: missed optimization opportunity X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00824.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-07 22:14 ------- That's just what the standard says: these variables are initialized when execution first passes their location of declaration. I guess this PR is indeed invalid, so I close it. W. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22355