From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24010 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2005 03:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23996 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jul 2005 03:12:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050708031246.23994.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050508212805.21456.andre.maute@gmx.de> References: <20050508212805.21456.andre.maute@gmx.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/21456] compile time regression(s) after gcc-4.0-20050326, 4.0 (+300%) 4.1 (+500%) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00928.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 03:12 ------- If you could add -ftime-report from all these, that would be helpful. Also note that O3 is not expected to be fast on compile time compared to O2, so it would be nice to know if the O2 numbers changed as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21456