From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-149608-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4693 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2005 18:50:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3828 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jul 2005 18:49:57 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050708184957.3827.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "igodard at pacbell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050708060632.22361.igodard@pacbell.net>
References: <20050708060632.22361.igodard@pacbell.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/22361] Fails to identify
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01031.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net  2005-07-08 18:49 -------
Er - aren't the "known to fail" and "known to work" reversed?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22361