From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-149639-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3537 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2005 22:42:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3511 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jul 2005 22:42:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:46:00 -0000
From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050708224214.22380.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/22380] New: [4.1 Regression] stack usage of g++.dg/opt/inline4.C increased
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01062.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

On hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, on mainline between 20050627 and 20050630 both at
07:00 UTC, the failure

FAIL: g++.dg/opt/inline4.C (test for excess errors)

appeared, the error being compile-time stack overflow.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-06/msg00121.html
shows the same failure appearing on Darwin.  I can reproduce the problem on
i686-pc-linux-gnu if I use "ulimit -s 4096", while a 4.0 branch compiler works
on the same testcase with "ulimit -s 256".  I don't know how much stack the test
needed just before the failure appeared.

-- 
           Summary: [4.1 Regression] stack usage of g++.dg/opt/inline4.C
                    increased
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22380