From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6513 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2005 01:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6495 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2005 01:59:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050710015941.6494.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050702130552.22277.laurent@guerby.net> References: <20050702130552.22277.laurent@guerby.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22277] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01169.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 01:59 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566 On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 12:54 +0000, dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 12:54 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE > cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566 > > On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:33 +0000, pluto at agmk dot net wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-08 09:33 ------- > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Most likely related to PR 22279. > > > > `first_vi_for_offset` bug still occurs and it's easy to reproduct > > There's a few bugs involved, it's just that the first_vi_for_offset is > the common place for the assert to trigger. Here is the reduced testcase for the C++ file you sent, i'm working on a fix. ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 01:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=9236) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9236&action=view) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22277