From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32214 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 20:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32198 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 20:12:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050711201208.32196.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050307183348.20363.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050307183348.20363.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01308.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-07-11 20:12 ------- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-11 20:02 ------- > Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope > > That seems to be as good as one could want! Paul, do you have any idea what find_special could be intended for? It seems obvious that it does the wrong thing in the case of this PR, and I can't see any case where it would be needed, but I would be surprised if there's no intent behind it, and in another compiler the function is still present, does the same thing, and is called in the same places. Are there maybe any other changes in symbol handling compensating for this? Erik, I'll give this some more thought before I commit your patch, so don't worry if I take a few days. - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20363