From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31992 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2005 11:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31977 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jul 2005 11:47:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050712114714.31976.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050307183348.20363.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050307183348.20363.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01422.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 11:47 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I do not know. I wondered the same, when Erik could apparently excise > the lot without breaking anything. I'm specifically worried that because of the known bad state of generic interfaces, this might be something which is simply not tested in the testsuite. Well, Erik's away for a few days, so we can contemplate this for a while without alienating him :-) > I am just about to return to modules and all that, so I'll put it on my > list of things to contemplate. Great. I'll see if can come up with a testcase that is broken by this change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20363