From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24575 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 13:38:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24563 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2005 13:38:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050714133818.24562.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050714131031.22485.mattias@virtutech.se> References: <20050714131031.22485.mattias@virtutech.se> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/22485] pointer +- integer is never NULL X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01732.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 13:38 ------- Hmmmm. I swear we just had this discussion for VRP purposes, and that a bug was recently fixed so that we don't assume that pointer + - integer is NULL. But if it's really undefined, maybe we should optimize it. Diego? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22485