From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32612 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 14:46:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32588 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2005 14:46:21 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050714144621.32587.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050714141428.22488.micis@gmx.de> References: <20050714141428.22488.micis@gmx.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] ICE: in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2585 with -O3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01751.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 14:46 ------- This case doesn't fail on my i686 x x86_64 cross for c++ as of today, so i'm going to guess it was the same bug. You should probably verify that the patch fixes it on your compiler, of course :) 06-11 is a bit old. Unfortunately, i'm pretty sure there have been some invasive changes elsewhere since then so you can't just copy the tree-ssa-structalias.c file from mainline over. (in particular, i think this snapshot is before the removal of var_ann->uid) Any snapshot after 2005-07-10 should be relatively easy to backport patches to if necessary now that we are in stage 3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488