From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12989 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2005 02:20:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12975 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jul 2005 02:20:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050716022001.12974.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22139] [4.0/4.1 regression] Segfault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg02000.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16 02:20 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Or, information about your exact GC parameters to I can try to reproduce it > that way? I think I know why the default GC parameters cannot reproduce this on the mainline is because the decl memory reduction caused us not to collect as much as often. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22139