public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "danalis at cis dot udel dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/22563] New: performance regression for gcc newer than 2.95 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050719191302.22563.danalis@cis.udel.edu> (raw) We ran bench++ to look for c++ samples that ran slower at -O3 with gcc-[34].x than with gcc-2.95. We're attaching one such case, minimized as far as we can (so it might not be testing the same thing as the original code). It consists of a simple function that accesses bitfields, called in a loop from main. gcc-3.4.3/gcc-4.0.0/gcc-4.1-20050627 all produce binaries that seem to be ten times slower on this than those produced by gcc-2.95.3. All the compilers happily inlined the function, which is fine. Here's the code from the older compiler: .L12: movb $86,%dl movb %dl,b_rec movb %dl,%al andb $7,%al cmpb $6,%al je .L14 call abort .align 4 .L14: andb $240,%dl cmpb $80,%dl je .L11 call abort .align 4 .L11: decl %ecx testl %ecx,%ecx jg .L12 And here's code from gcc-4.1-20050625: jmp .L16 .p2align 4,,7 .L27: andb $-16, %dl cmpb $80, %dl jne .L25 decl %ebx je .L26 .L16: movl %ecx, %eax andl $-8, %eax orl $6, %eax movl %eax, b_rec andb $-9, b_rec movl b_rec, %eax andl $-241, %eax orl $80, %eax movl %eax, b_rec movl %eax, %ecx movzbl b_rec, %edx movb %dl, %al andb $7, %al cmpb $6, %al je .L27 We'll attach the preprocessed source. -- Summary: performance regression for gcc newer than 2.95 Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: danalis at cis dot udel dot edu CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: i686-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22563
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-19 19:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-07-19 19:20 danalis at cis dot udel dot edu [this message] 2005-07-19 19:53 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/22563] " danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-07-19 19:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/22563] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04 19:16 ` danalis at cis dot udel dot edu 2005-08-25 3:26 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-09-27 15:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050719191302.22563.danalis@cis.udel.edu \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).