From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9114 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2005 18:58:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9085 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jul 2005 18:58:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050720185831.9084.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp> References: <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg02433.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20 18:58 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug. > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;) Not any more since we are in stage3 already. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131