[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-28 22:40 -------
Suspending as this will take a major change in the C++ front-end.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED
           Keywords|                            |pessimizes-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-20 18:44 -------
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pluto at agmk dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pluto at agmk dot net]

------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net  2005-07-20 18:53 -------
hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug. 
4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;) 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-20 18:58 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug. 
> 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;) 
Not any more since we are in stage3 already.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[schlie at comcast dot net]

------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net  2005-07-20 19:03 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug. 
> > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;) 
> Not any more since we are in stage3 already.

- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
   it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for 4.1.
   (so should no likely assumed as being so).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

Re: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:

> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
>    it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for 
> 4.1.
>    (so should no likely assumed as being so).

It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in 
2.95 for
this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really.

Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except 
for fixing
bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs.

-- Pinski

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2005-07-20 19:11 -------
Subject: Re:  Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?


On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:

> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
>    it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for 
> 4.1.
>    (so should no likely assumed as being so).

It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in 
2.95 for
this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really.

Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except 
for fixing
bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs.

-- Pinski



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2005-07-20 19:47 -------
It may be true that this bug isn't going to be fixed in this cycle, 
but there's no reason not to keep it open instead of suspending it. 
The "suspend" state is mean for PRs where we need external things to 
happen, such as a defect report to be accepted. This clearly isn't the 
case here. 
 
I'll close this PR and reopen 22575 instead. 
 
W. 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22575 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[mrs at apple dot com]

------- Comment #12 from mrs at apple dot com  2006-08-10 16:54 -------
Trivially, one could use turing completeness at compile time to achieve the
desired result.  :-)  Not that I think that is better than `fixing' this bug.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[bjoern dot haase at de dot bosch dot com]

------- Comment #11 from bjoern dot haase at de dot bosch dot com  2006-08-10 12:11 -------
Hi,

here is a much simpler test case for this issue.

Bjoern.



#include <complex>

using namespace std;

const complex<char> should_be_in_rodata (42,-42);
complex<char> should_be_in_data (42,-42);
complex<char> should_be_in_bss;


-- 

bjoern dot haase at de dot bosch dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bjoern dot haase at de dot
                   |                            |bosch dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-18 00:55 -------
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-18 00:51 -------
Reopening this bug since it is the correct one to keep open.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131