public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/22605] New: Allocation of structures across stack slots Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:45:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050722045450.22605.ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> (raw) Hi, gcc 4 seems quite a bit smarter at keeping the stack smaller, and as you can see below allocates the 8 byte structure across two stack slots. It did break something, which drew this to my attention, and James Wilson already some analsysis in http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0507/1885.html. Quoting him > If gcc-3.4 and earlier, some structures (BLKmode structures) were being > over-aligned when allocated to stack slots. They always got the maximum > alignment (16 bytes for IA-64) instead of their natural alignment. It > isn't clear why. I think this was an accident of implementation. We > were basing variable alignment on modes instead of type alignment, and > since some BLKmode structures do require max alignment, we had to give > it to all of them. We came to the conclusion that we are unsure if this is a bug or a feature. I am unsure if the larger stack space required is a good trade off against possible better code. Thanks, -i --- sample --- ianw@lime:/tmp$ cat test.c #include <stdio.h> struct disk_stat { int fd; unsigned count; }; int main(void) { int blah; struct disk_stat test; printf("%p\n", &blah); printf("%p\n", &test); } ianw@lime:/tmp$ gcc-3.4 -o test test.c ianw@lime:/tmp$ ./test 0x60000fffffcdf480 0x60000fffffcdf490 ianw@lime:/tmp$ gcc-4.0 -o test test.c ianw@lime:/tmp$ ./test 0x60000fffffd57490 0x60000fffffd57494 -- Summary: Allocation of structures across stack slots Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22605
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-22 4:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-07-22 5:45 ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au [this message] 2005-07-22 18:12 ` [Bug middle-end/22605] Alignment of struct on stack is no longer the maxium alignment pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 20:15 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050722045450.22605.ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).