From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11374 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2005 09:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10827 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2005 09:41:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050722094150.10825.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "uros at kss-loka dot si" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050715100129.22497.uros@kss-loka.si> References: <20050715100129.22497.uros@kss-loka.si> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/22497] A register is wasted in simple vectorised loops X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg02689.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-07-22 09:41 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Oh, I have a local patch which will cause this, woops: > + if (parts.scale != 1) > + cost--; > + > if (parts.seg != SEG_DEFAULT) > cost--; Do you plan to submit this patch to gcc-patches? It sure optimizes some code, and the testcase from decription could be used to show benefits of this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22497