From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31620 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2005 18:05:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31611 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2005 18:05:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050722180533.31610.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050722045450.22605.ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> References: <20050722045450.22605.ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/22605] Alignment of struct on stack is no longer the maxium alignment X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg02741.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 18:05 ------- Huh? I don't understand what do you mean by stack slots because there is no such thing in GCC. Do you mean you want disk_stat aligned to 16 byte? Note the alignment of disk_stat is 4byte so GCC should not require it to be 8byte alignment. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c |middle-end Summary|Allocation of structures |Alignment of struct on stack |across stack slots |is no longer the maxium | |alignment http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22605