public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8
@ 2004-04-22 23:22 duz at sol-3 dot de
2004-04-23 6:28 ` [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: duz at sol-3 dot de @ 2004-04-22 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Actually, I'm building a cross compiler to target Solaris-2.8.
As this drags in the Solaris include files, I figure this error
might also happen when compiling on Solaris-2.8.
Anyway, the fix is simply to add line
#include <limits.h> /* for PATH_MAX */
to
gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/sparc/gmon-sol2.c
/pub/unpacked/gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/sparc/gmon-sol2.c:182: error: `PATH_MAX' unde
clared (first use in this function)
--
Summary: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: duz at sol-3 dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
@ 2004-04-23 6:28 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-28 22:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-23 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-23 05:31 -------
> Actually, I'm building a cross compiler to target Solaris-2.8.
You didn't provide enough information. Please specify the host, the exact target,
the configure line, the 'make' command line and so on. Also specify how much of
a cross-compilation environment is intalled on the host.
> As this drags in the Solaris include files, I figure this error
> might also happen when compiling on Solaris-2.8.
No, we wouldn't have shipped a compiler that doesn't build on Solaris 8.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Component|c |target
GCC target triplet| |*-*-solaris2.8
Summary|Minor compilation problem on|Minor compilation problem
|Solaris-2.8 |for cross to Solaris 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
2004-04-23 6:28 ` [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-28 22:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 15:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-28 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-28 20:26 -------
Investigation at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01738.html .
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-28 20:26:18
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
2004-04-23 6:28 ` [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-28 22:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-04 15:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-03 8:01 ` [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-04 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-04 15:38 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00173.html>, this looks like a
regression also.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 15:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-03 8:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 17:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-03 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-03 08:01 -------
Yes, it's a regression.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Minor compilation problem |[3.4/3.5 regression] Minor
|for cross to Solaris 8 |compilation problem for
| |cross to Solaris 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-03 8:01 ` [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-14 17:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 18:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-14 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-14 17:20 -------
Eric, if this patch looks correct to you, would you please apply it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-14 17:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-14 18:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 18:44 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-14 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-14 18:41 -------
> Eric, if this patch looks correct to you, would you please apply it?
Yes, it looks correct to me but I'm not familiar with the Makefile machinery.
I'm going to ping Alexandre, who seems to be versed in the cross-compilation
business.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-14 18:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-14 18:44 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-21 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-14 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-14 18:44 -------
Hi Alexandre,
Would you mind reviewing the patch linked to from comment #3 in the audit trail
of this PR? You will also find a discussion linked to from comment #2.
Thanks in advance.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-14 18:44 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-21 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-21 14:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-21 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 14:15 -------
Alexandre explained why the patch is not correct and suggested a solution:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01646.html
The workaround is probably to create the missing directory before building the
cross-compiler.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|patch |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-21 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-21 14:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-10 20:11 ` [Bug other/15082] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-21 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 14:26 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.4.2.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.1 |3.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-21 14:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-10 20:11 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-29 18:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-10 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-10 20:11 -------
The problem lies in the Makefile machinery.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-10 20:11 ` [Bug other/15082] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-29 18:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01 0:47 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-29 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-29 18:57 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.4.3.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.2 |3.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-29 18:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-01 0:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 1:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-01 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 00:46 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.4.4.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.3 |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-01 0:47 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-20 1:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-19 17:49 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-20 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |build
Last reconfirmed|2004-04-28 20:26:18 |2004-12-20 01:16:52
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-20 1:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-19 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-19 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 17:49 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-22 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-22 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 21:13 -------
Moving to 4.0.2 pre Mark.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-27 16:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-27 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-30 22:38 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
problem for cross to Solaris 8
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:36 -------
> (In reply to comment #15)
>
>>Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
>> problem for cross to Solaris 8
>>What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
>>blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
>>fields, as I've described.
>
>
> Flags are better as we can have a requestor and only one group of people able
> to set the flag (you in this case). So if I requested this should be a
> blocker, you can deny it without even being CC'd to the bug. It is a little
> more automated than what fields do. This is why I asked about flags. Fields
> to me should not be used in this way.
I don't think I agree. Maybe I can be made to, but please drive this on
the GCC list, and get buy-in, rather than doing it unilaterally. These
fields are tools for the RM, and all you're doing at the moment is
confusing me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-30 22:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:36 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
> problem for cross to Solaris 8
> What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
> blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
> fields, as I've described.
Flags are better as we can have a requestor and only one group of people able
to set the flag (you in this case). So if I requested this should be a
blocker, you can deny it without even being CC'd to the bug. It is a little
more automated than what fields do. This is why I asked about flags. Fields
to me should not be used in this way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-30 22:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-30 22:33 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
problem for cross to Solaris 8
What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
fields, as I've described.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-30 22:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:23 -------
We now have --build-sysroot, which ameliorates this situation.
(I don't fully understand Alexandre's suggestion, in the message linked from
Comment #13.)
In any case, I've downgraded this to P5, as, although clearly desirable,
building such a cross-compiler will not be release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-30 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-22 23:22 [Bug c/15082] New: Minor compilation problem on Solaris-2.8 duz at sol-3 dot de
2004-04-23 6:28 ` [Bug target/15082] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-28 22:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 15:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-03 8:01 ` [Bug target/15082] [3.4/3.5 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 17:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 18:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 18:44 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-21 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-21 14:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-10 20:11 ` [Bug other/15082] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-29 18:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01 0:47 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 1:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-19 17:49 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-30 22:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).