From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13769 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2005 20:25:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13700 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jul 2005 20:25:05 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:32:00 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20050723202503.22635.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22635] New: OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg02991.txt.bz2 List-Id: I noticed this when looking at compile time / memory usage of PR 8361 and I noticed that OVERLOAD is currently a link list and we only use about 2 of the fields in the tree which seems like a waste for a full tree. I started to change it to be a VEC but ran into problems as it looks like we can be in the middle of the linked list but I did not check for sure. -- Summary: OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: memory-hog, compile-time-hog Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22635