public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/22114] Incorrect diagnostic for specialization of a nested class template Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:59:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050723205641.20326.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050618141304.22114.cpp@tempest-sw.com> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-23 20:56 ------- You can't specialize an inner template without specializing its outer template as well. As per /18: 18In an explicit specialization declaration for a member of a class template or a member template that appears in namespace scope, the member template and some of its enclosing class templates may remain unspecialized, except that the declaration shall not explicitly specialize a class member template if its enclosing class templates are not explicitly specialized as well. In such explicit specialization declaration, the keyword template followed by a template-parameter-list shall be provided instead of the template<> preceding the explicit specialization declaration of the member. The types of the template-parameters in the template-parameter-list shall be the same as those specified in the primary template definition. [Example: template<class T1> class A { template<class T2> class B { template<class T3> void mf1(T3); void mf2(); }; }; template<> template<class X> class A<int>::B { }; template<> template<> template<class T> void A<int>::B<double>::mf1(T t) { } template<class Y> template<> void A<Y>::B<double>::mf2() { } // ill-formed; B<double> is specialized but // its enclosing class template A is not --end example] -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22114
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-23 20:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-06-18 14:13 [Bug c++/22114] New: " cpp at tempest-sw dot com 2005-06-18 14:13 ` [Bug c++/22114] " cpp at tempest-sw dot com 2005-06-18 14:47 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-18 15:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 20:59 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050723205641.20326.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).