public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented
@ 2005-07-25 15:28 p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk @ 2005-07-25 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The %VAL construct is used for passing arguments by value, rather than the
usual by reference or descriptor. It is vital for interoperability with other
languages such as C.
This feature is available in g77:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.4/g77/_0025VAL_0028_0029.html#_0025VAL_0028_0029
My interest in this feature comes from the world of astronomy where we have
a large legacy code base (~1 Million SLOC) written in Fortran 77, (see
http://cvsweb.starlink.ac.uk) where this feature is used for efficiently
accessing large data arrays using mmap, complex data structures, and for
accessing dynamic memory.
--
Summary: %VAL construct not implemented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
@ 2005-07-25 15:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 15:34 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |19292
nThis| |
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-25 15:34:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 15:54 -------
*** Bug 23062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:37 -------
*** Bug 23063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:56 -------
*** Bug 23064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-25 16:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).