public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented @ 2005-07-25 15:28 p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk @ 2005-07-25 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs The %VAL construct is used for passing arguments by value, rather than the usual by reference or descriptor. It is vital for interoperability with other languages such as C. This feature is available in g77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.4/g77/_0025VAL_0028_0029.html#_0025VAL_0028_0029 My interest in this feature comes from the world of astronomy where we have a large legacy code base (~1 Million SLOC) written in Fortran 77, (see http://cvsweb.starlink.ac.uk) where this feature is used for efficiently accessing large data arrays using mmap, complex data structures, and for accessing dynamic memory. -- Summary: %VAL construct not implemented Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented 2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk @ 2005-07-25 15:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 15:34 ------- Confirmed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |19292 nThis| | Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-25 15:34:50 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented 2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 15:54 ------- *** Bug 23062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented 2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:37 ------- *** Bug 23063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented 2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-25 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:56 ------- *** Bug 23064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-25 16:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-07-25 15:28 [Bug fortran/23060] New: %VAL construct not implemented p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2005-07-25 15:40 ` [Bug fortran/23060] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).