From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13025 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2005 20:56:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12823 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jul 2005 20:56:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050726205610.12822.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050721155650.22591.Simon.Finn@reify.co.uk> References: <20050721155650.22591.Simon.Finn@reify.co.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22591] [4.0 regression] wrong alias information causes an incorrect redundant load elimination X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg03446.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 20:56 ------- (In reply to comment #39) > This is not yet fixed. The 4.0 branch has the same problem. > You are not very patient, are you? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22591