public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/19613] New: java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
@ 2005-01-24 20:48 tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 20:59 ` [Bug libgcj/19613] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The current java.util.prefs.Preferences.userRoot defaults
to a memory-based back end. Instead we should have a
file-based back end that default to reading from
$HOME/.java/.userPrefs and is compatible with the JDK.
--
Summary: java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread[parent not found: <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-02-14 22:29 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 8:29 ` thebohemian at gmx dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-14 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 22:29 -------
I couldn't find any documentation for this format, so
interoperation is not easily possible.
Also this page (see bottom) indicates that we ought to try
loading the prefs provider via the service factory code:
http://javaonnet.blogspot.com/2005/10/javautilprefspreferences-class.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-14 22:29 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-15 8:29 ` thebohemian at gmx dot net
2006-03-01 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: thebohemian at gmx dot net @ 2006-02-15 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from thebohemian at gmx dot net 2006-02-15 08:28 -------
As for the format Sun mentions this DTD in their API doc:
http://java.sun.com/dtd/preferences.dtd
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-14 22:29 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 8:29 ` thebohemian at gmx dot net
@ 2006-03-01 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 18:40 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-01 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 17:13 -------
That format is used for exporting preferences to a file.
It turns out they use a variant of that for writing the
preferences to the preference store. However, how locking is
handled is undocumented. So, interoperating looks difficult.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-01 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 18:40 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
2007-10-09 18:43 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org @ 2007-10-09 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2007-10-09 18:40 -------
Current Classpath has:
FileBasedFactory.java GConfBasedFactory.java MemoryBasedFactory.java
so 3 times the number of factories as when this bug was written. Can we close
it or are we still not compatible with Sun?
--
gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 18:40 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
@ 2007-10-09 18:43 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-09 19:20 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
2008-02-09 19:29 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 18:43 -------
We still don't interoperate properly.
Now that OpenJDK exists someone could implement this, if we still care.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 18:43 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-09 19:20 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
2008-02-09 19:29 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: neugens at limasoftware dot net @ 2008-02-09 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
neugens at limasoftware dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |neugens at limasoftware dot
| |net
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |neugens at limasoftware dot
|dot org |net
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-07-26 21:55:03 |2008-02-09 19:19:52
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug classpath/19613] java.util.prefs should work like the JDK
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-09 19:20 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
@ 2008-02-09 19:29 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: neugens at limasoftware dot net @ 2008-02-09 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from neugens at limasoftware dot net 2008-02-09 19:28 -------
I ported the GConf backend to OpenJDK, and I'm integrating it IcedTea; this
would make the two compatible as once completed it would share the GConf paths
between Classpath, Gcj and OpenJDK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-09 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-24 20:48 [Bug libgcj/19613] New: java.util.prefs should work like the JDK tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 20:59 ` [Bug libgcj/19613] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 23:19 ` [Bug classpath/19613] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-19613-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-14 22:29 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 8:29 ` thebohemian at gmx dot net
2006-03-01 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 18:40 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
2007-10-09 18:43 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-09 19:20 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
2008-02-09 19:29 ` neugens at limasoftware dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).