public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape
@ 2005-07-29 13:40 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-29 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23134] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-29 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Take this "stupid" example (even though this most likely shows up in GCC but I don't know for sure):
int g1(int);
static void h(int *a) { *a = 1; }

int g(void)
{
  int t = 0;
  h(&t);
  int t1 = t;
  g1(t1);
  return t1 == t;
}

That return should have been turned into "return 1" as t does not escape via h as h only touches it.
Compile with -O3 -fno-inline to see the problem.

-- 
           Summary: Address escapes even though the called function does not
                    cause it to escape
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape
  2005-07-29 13:40 [Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-29 13:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-29 14:29 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
  2005-08-11 17:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-29 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |alias


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape
  2005-07-29 13:40 [Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-29 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23134] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-29 14:29 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
  2005-08-11 17:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru @ 2005-07-29 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru  2005-07-29 13:57 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-07-29 13:57:51
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape
  2005-07-29 13:40 [Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-29 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23134] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-29 14:29 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
@ 2005-08-11 17:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-11 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-11 17:20 -------
I think the FIXME in tree-ssa-operands.c is the issue here:
  /* FIXME - if we have better information from the static vars
     analysis, we need to make the cache call site specific.  This way
     we can have the performance benefits even if we are doing good
     optimization.  */

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-11 17:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-29 13:40 [Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23134] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 14:29 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-08-11 17:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).